March 31, 2023
5 min read
In Elizabeth Cox’s 3-minute TED-Ed talk, she explores the age-old question: What is fire? Is it a solid, a liquid, or a gas? Through a captivating exploration of both scientific and sensory evidence, Cox provides an answer to the question that has puzzled mankind for generations.
Using AI, the Yoodli speech coach platform provides this TED-Ed talk transcript for “Is Fire a Solid, a Liquid, or a Gas?”:
"Sitting around a campfire, you can feel its heat, smell the woody smoke, and hear it crackle. If you get too close, it burns your eyes and stings your nostrils. You could stare at the bright flames forever as they twist and flicker in endless incarnations. But what exactly are you looking at?
The flames are obviously not solid, nor are they liquid. Mingling with the air, they’re more like a gas, but more visible — and more fleeting. And on a scientific level, fire differs from gas because gases can exist in the same state indefinitely while fires always burn out eventually.
One misconception is that fire is a plasma, the fourth state of matter in which atoms are stripped of their electrons. Like fire and unlike the other kinds of matter, plasmas don’t exist in a stable state on earth. They only form when gas is exposed to an electric field or superheated to temperatures of thousands or tens of thousands of degrees. By contrast, fuels like wood and paper burn at a few hundred degrees — far below the threshold of what’s usually considered a plasma.
So if fire isn’t a solid, liquid, gas, or a plasma, what does that leave? It turns out fire isn’t actually matter at all. Instead, it’s our sensory experience of a chemical reaction called combustion. In a way, fire is like the leaves changing color in fall, the smell of fruit as it ripens, or a firefly’s blinking light. All of these are sensory clues that a chemical reaction is taking place. What differs about fire is that it engages a lot of our senses at the same time, creating the kind of vivid experience we expect to come from a physical thing.
Combustion creates that sensory experience using fuel, heat, and oxygen. In a campfire, when the logs are heated to their ignition temperature, the walls of their cells decompose, releasing sugars and other molecules into the air. These molecules then react with airborne oxygen to create carbon dioxide and water. At the same time, any trapped water in the logs vaporizes, expands, ruptures the wood around it, and escapes with a satisfying crackle. As the fire heats up, the carbon dioxide and water vapor created by combustion expand. Now that they’re less dense, they rise in a thinning column. Gravity causes this expansion and rising, which gives flames their characteristic taper. Without gravity, molecules don’t separate by density and the flames have a totally different shape.We can see all of this because combustion also generates light. Molecules emit light when heated, and the color of the light depends on the temperature of the molecules.
The hottest flames are white or blue. The type of molecules in a fire can also influence flame color. For instance, any unreacted carbon atoms from the logs form little clumps of soot that rise into the flames and emit the yellow-orange light we associate with a campfire. Substances like copper, calcium chloride, and potassium chloride can add their own characteristic hues to the mix. Besides colorful flames, fire also continues to generate heat as it burns. This heat sustains the flames by keeping the fuel at or above ignition temperature. Eventually, though, even the hottest fires run out of fuel or oxygen. Then, those twisting flames give a final hiss and disappear with a wisp of smoke as if they were never there at all."
If you appreciated this analysis of Cox’s “Is Fire a Solid, a Liquid, or a Gas?” TED-Ed talk, you can sign up for a free Yoodli account here.
Just record or upload an address of any length or subject and get instant critique as well as advice for making it better.
Cox’s word choice analytics were excellent. However, the impressive analytics could be in part due to the fact that Cox wasn’t delivering this talk live. Her TED-Ed talk had zero filler words, no instances of non-inclusive language, and less than 1% of weak words. To give you a better idea of the norm, it’s pretty common for speakers to score about 4% in these areas.
The delivery of Cox’s TED-Ed talk was successful. However, it should be noted that the delivery should be credited to narrator narrated by Addison Anderson. Plus, since this talk was a TED-Ed talk, it was animated, so we don’t get to see Anderson delivering this live.
Still, we can at least take a look at his speaking pace which was around 142 words per minute. This is a very relaxed, conversational pace which is perfect for educational talks. He also used natural pauses to allow the viewer to digest his talk easier.
Yoodli wasn’t just designed to analyze TED-Ed speakers. In fact, anyone can use this AI speech coach to improve their speech and confidence. Try it out for yourself today to discover your own speaking analytics — totally for free.
Getting better at speaking is getting easier. Record or upload a speech and let our AI Speech Coach analyze your speaking and give you feedback.